These were run on the same laptop that I used in the contest in 2010, which as I recall is slower than the contest virtual machines were. Bots which need the time may play weaker in my tests than they did in the contest. There are some.
Some of the opponent names here do not match the correct names on the official site. Sorry.
300 games each against earlier versions on random maps.
| bot | win rate | wins | losses | draws |
| oddshrimp3.3 | 56.5% | 122 | 83 | 95 |
| oddshrimp3.2 | 59.3% | 152 | 96 | 52 |
| oddshrimp3.1 | 61.3% | 156 | 88 | 56 |
200 games each against 20 opponents, 4000 games total. The best estimate elo is 3454, corresponding to rank 15. Compared to the previous version, oddshrimp3.4 scores consistently much better against the weaker opponents in the table (from rebelxt on), but improvements against the others are mixed—in particular, it does worse against medrimonia. I think that reflects its now balanced style of play.
| opponent | rank | win rate | wins | losses | draws |
| bocsimacko | 1 | 21.0% | 39 | 155 | 6 |
| iori | 2 | 38.0% | 70 | 118 | 12 |
| GreenTea | 8 | 41.5% | 77 | 111 | 12 |
| dmj111 | 12 | 39.8% | 74 | 115 | 11 |
| davidjliu | 13 | 54.0% | 105 | 89 | 6 |
| wagstaff | 17 | 57.5% | 109 | 79 | 12 |
| medrimonia | 18 | 44.5% | 87 | 109 | 4 |
| smloh | 19 | 67.5% | 133 | 63 | 4 |
| Neverstu | 28 | 61.3% | 118 | 73 | 9 |
| Manwe | 31 | 54.8% | 107 | 88 | 5 |
| animatroid | 36 | 65.8% | 130 | 67 | 3 |
| mogron | 46 | 70.8% | 141 | 58 | 1 |
| deccan | 47 | 68.0% | 131 | 59 | 10 |
| rebelxt | 53 | 71.5% | 141 | 55 | 4 |
| malazan | 54 | 76.5% | 143 | 37 | 20 |
| fglider | 61 | 68.0% | 135 | 63 | 2 |
| eAshoka | 65-ish | 80.2% | 159 | 38 | 3 |
| Mistmanov | 77 | 77.5% | 146 | 36 | 18 |
| E323 | 78 | 72.8% | 144 | 53 | 3 |
| FlagCapper | 91 | 72.0% | 143 | 55 | 2 |
February 2014