These were run on the same laptop that I used in the contest in 2010, which as I recall is slower than the contest virtual machines were. Bots which need the time may play weaker in my tests than they did in the contest. There are some.
Some of the opponent names here do not match the correct names on the official site. Sorry.
300 games each against oddshrimp3.x versions.
| bot | win rate | wins | losses | draws |
| oddshrimp3.4 | 59.8% | 152 | 93 | 55 |
| oddshrimp3.3 | 64.2% | 172 | 87 | 41 |
| oddshrimp3.2 | 70.8% | 196 | 71 | 33 |
| oddshrimp3.1 | 67.0% | 187 | 85 | 28 |
200 games each against 20 opponents, 4000 games total. The best estimate elo is a little over 3500, a smidge ahead of but not statistically distinguishable from the tight group of contestants at ranks 4-8. I called it 5 as a round number.
Compared to 3.4, oddshrimp4.1 is stronger versus most opponents and weaker versus none. 3.1 had to same relation to 2.4. Dmj111 remains a difficult opponent.
| opponent | rank | win rate | wins | losses | draws |
| bocsimacko | 1 | 28.5% | 54 | 140 | 6 |
| iori | 2 | 40.2% | 75 | 114 | 11 |
| GreenTea | 8 | 50.2% | 96 | 95 | 9 |
| dmj111 | 12 | 47.5% | 91 | 101 | 8 |
| davidjliu | 13 | 60.5% | 117 | 75 | 8 |
| wagstaff | 17 | 62.0% | 119 | 71 | 10 |
| medrimonia | 18 | 59.2% | 115 | 78 | 7 |
| smloh | 19 | 72.0% | 142 | 54 | 4 |
| Neverstu | 28 | 71.8% | 141 | 54 | 5 |
| Manwe | 31 | 62.3% | 121 | 72 | 7 |
| animatroid | 36 | 77.2% | 151 | 42 | 7 |
| mogron | 46 | 78.5% | 157 | 43 | 0 |
| deccan | 47 | 81.5% | 160 | 34 | 6 |
| rebelxt | 53 | 75.2% | 146 | 45 | 9 |
| malazan | 54 | 75.8% | 149 | 46 | 5 |
| fglider | 61 | 70.8% | 141 | 58 | 1 |
| eAshoka | 65-ish | 79.5% | 157 | 39 | 4 |
| Mistmanov | 77 | 78.2% | 153 | 40 | 7 |
| E323 | 78 | 74.5% | 145 | 47 | 8 |
| FlagCapper | 91 | 83.5% | 165 | 31 | 4 |
February 2014